PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 114.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FNV at -18.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Some yoy growth while FNV is negative at -47.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-80.37%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -127.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth while FNV is negative at -164.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-284.77%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-84.71%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 352.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8917.28%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -90.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-11.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FNV at -38.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.80%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -68.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. FNV's 31695.36%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
82.91%
Some yoy expansion while FNV is negative at -613.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FNV at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-30.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -115.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
2.50%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -77.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. FNV's 12962.60%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.