95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-43.00%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 14.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.42%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-36.46%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -23.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
9.16%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -1.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1691.76%
AR growth while FNV is negative at -41.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -53.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
156.30%
Well above FNV's 78.47%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
25.61%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FNV's 13.76%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-275.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 97.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while FNV is negative at -22.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2979.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 97.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-301.07%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 88.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
200.67%
Debt repayment growth of 200.67% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.