95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 213.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 37.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSM stands at 709.81%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -96.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
204.75%
Well above FSM's 73.81% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above FSM's 130.43%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-163.11%
Both negative yoy, with FSM at -87.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.42%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of FSM's 977.98%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
62.15%
CapEx growth well above FSM's 12.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
5292.00%
We have some outflow growth while FSM is negative at -0.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above FSM's 22.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.