95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
124.21%
Net income growth similar to FSM's 114.91%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
4.94%
Some D&A expansion while FSM is negative at -99.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
68.61%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSM's 176.25%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
58.28%
SBC growth while FSM is negative at -78.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-322.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -183.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.44%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -285.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-637.34%
Negative yoy AP while FSM is 72.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-204.46%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 106.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.59%
Negative yoy while FSM is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-14.72%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSM at -101.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
99.97%
CapEx growth well above FSM's 37.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.73%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FSM's 198.55%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
99.90%
Investing outflow well above FSM's 48.38%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-352.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSM is 94.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-332.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.