PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.16%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -153.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.22%
Less D&A growth vs. FSM's 2109.55%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
262.53%
Well above FSM's 51.98% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-125.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -61.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
77.19%
Slight usage while FSM is negative at -37.03%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-314.48%
AR is negative yoy while FSM is 103.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.47%
A yoy AP increase while FSM is negative at -356.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-244.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -391.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-132.63%
Both negative yoy, with FSM at -8.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
18.03%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -297.60%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-648.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSM is 61.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.99%
We have some outflow growth while FSM is negative at -99.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-125.59%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -2766.67%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.