PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSM at -38.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
Less D&A growth vs. FSM's 122.42%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while FSM is negative at -57.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -141.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
266.55%
Well above FSM's 167.38% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth well above FSM's 153.49%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while FSM is 166.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -222.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
101.73%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -45.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while FSM is 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -114.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 24.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 3.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
Growth well above FSM's 60.74%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 22.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of FSM's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.