95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.49%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.08%
Some D&A expansion while FSM is negative at -87.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSM stands at 47.82%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-89.79%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -114.10%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-165.93%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -416.75%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
127.57%
AR growth while FSM is negative at -106.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.36%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 58.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
58.14%
Well above FSM's 102.90%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.97%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -79.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
68.13%
CapEx growth well above FSM's 5.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.79%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSM is 30.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-24.95%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 256.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
30.76%
We repay more while FSM is negative at -192800.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.