PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 42.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 92.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while FSM is 31.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -387.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
134.82%
AR growth well above FSM's 76.59%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FSM's 1278.78%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-202.13%
Both negative yoy, with FSM at -16.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.83%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSM at -31.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
64.30%
CapEx growth well above FSM's 97.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
129.23%
Liquidation growth of 129.23% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
69.70%
We have some outflow growth while FSM is negative at -603.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
200.22%
Investing outflow well above FSM's 80.10%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-91.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -127.74%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.