PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 62.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 16.40%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
79.42%
SBC growth while FSM is negative at -132.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -81.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -25.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
117.96%
Some inventory rise while FSM is negative at -66.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-231.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSM at -135.30%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while FSM is negative at -90.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -250.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -41.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -4.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
We have some outflow growth while FSM is negative at -104.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
76.94%
We have mild expansions while FSM is negative at -27.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSM is 89.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
We slightly raise equity while FSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.