PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSM at -93.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.34%
D&A growth well above FSM's 11.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-70.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FSM stands at 100.53%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -46.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Well above FSM's 94.23% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.50%
AR growth well above FSM's 229.77%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while FSM is 83.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
A yoy AP increase while FSM is negative at -61.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 108.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Negative yoy while FSM is 21.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while FSM is 42.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
CapEx growth well above FSM's 16.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Purchases growth of 86.92% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -732.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.51%
Investing outflow well above FSM's 11.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSM is 8.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-69.57%
Negative yoy issuance while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.