95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FSM at -3788.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSM at -5.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-203.03%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9953.49%
SBC growth well above FSM's 359.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
14.17%
Slight usage while FSM is negative at -99.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.54%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -135.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
388.85%
Some inventory rise while FSM is negative at -146.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-14.78%
Negative yoy AP while FSM is 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-37.48%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 17.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
57.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FSM's 3006.24%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
11.35%
Some CFO growth while FSM is negative at -23.25%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
283.86%
Some CapEx rise while FSM is negative at -24.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Purchases well above FSM's 61.89%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -20.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
284.00%
We have mild expansions while FSM is negative at -23.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
1.99%
Debt repayment well below FSM's 28.15%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
4483.93%
Issuance growth of 4483.93% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSM is 97.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.