PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 107.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Negative yoy D&A while FSM is 2.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
46.81%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FSM's 151.82%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-12.71%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-138.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -11675.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-57.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FSM at -368.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while FSM is 45.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSM at -86.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 198.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -107.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSM at -15.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while FSM is 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while FSM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while FSM is 94.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while FSM stands at 18.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -73.98%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
233.43%
Issuance growth of 233.43% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to FSM's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.