PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while FSM is negative at -70.72%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
Some D&A expansion while FSM is negative at -7.32%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while FSM is negative at -86.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while FSM is 470.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Well above FSM's 124.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth well above FSM's 162.01%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-70.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FSM at -211.04%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
113.08%
AP growth well above FSM's 189.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 339.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Well above FSM's 49.74%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.92%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -9.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases growth of 99.62% while FSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -159.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -22.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
We repay more while FSM is negative at -64.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.