PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 127.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FSM at -28.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Well above FSM's 82.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.37%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FSM at -74.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FSM at -4092.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth well above FSM's 52.49%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while FSM is negative at -2485.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-284.77%
Both negative yoy AP, with FSM at -183.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-84.71%
Negative yoy usage while FSM is 82.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
8917.28%
Some yoy increase while FSM is negative at -47.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-11.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FSM at -54.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FSM's 22.57%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above FSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
82.91%
Purchases well above FSM's 20.48%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FSM at -53.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-30.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with FSM at -144.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
2.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FSM's 24.78%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-3.50%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FSM is 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.42%
We slightly raise equity while FSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while FSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.