PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.58%
Less D&A growth vs. GFI's 9.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
127.08%
Deferred tax of 127.08% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-72.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
266.55%
Well above GFI's 167.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth well above GFI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Growth of 144.39% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
101.73%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -19.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while GFI stands at 100.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
Growth well above GFI's 91.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while GFI stands at 68.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
Debt repayment growth of 64.56% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.