95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.19%
Less D&A growth vs. GFI's 9.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
0.25%
Deferred tax of 0.25% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
177.90%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-55.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 167.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-509.30%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Growth of 6.85% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-101.84%
Both negative yoy, with GFI at -109.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
30.24%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 27.35%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-1.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -19.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above GFI's 100.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
70800.00%
Liquidation growth of 70800.00% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16528.30%
Growth well above GFI's 91.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1431.96%
Investing outflow well above GFI's 68.33%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
6.80%
Debt repayment growth of 6.80% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.