95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Some net income increase while GFI is negative at -31.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.18%
Some D&A expansion while GFI is negative at -17.76%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -17.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth of 147.24% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1616.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GFI at -104.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-919.60%
Negative yoy while GFI is 59.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-6.78%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GFI at -4.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
58.29%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -36.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-101.56%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-188.06%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -31.79%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
Debt repayment growth of 99.91% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.