95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 3.74%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.88%
Less D&A growth vs. GFI's 36.42%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
58.43%
Deferred tax of 58.43% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
33.34%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -1.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-161.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GFI at -9177.78%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.54%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.38%
Negative yoy usage while GFI is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-8516.17%
Negative yoy while GFI is 421.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 32.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16744.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -31.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Purchases growth of 100.10% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
2516.86%
Liquidation growth of 2516.86% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
144.26%
Growth of 144.26% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-4026.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -28.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-0.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
932.90%
Issuance growth of 932.90% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.