PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GFI at -58.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.62%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 32.24%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-203.03%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9953.49%
SBC growth while GFI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
14.17%
Slight usage while GFI is negative at -1760.01%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.54%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
388.85%
Inventory growth of 388.85% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-14.78%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-37.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GFI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
57.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GFI's 3293.49%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
11.35%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 10.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
283.86%
Some CapEx rise while GFI is negative at -7.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Purchases growth of 79.73% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 309.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
We have mild expansions while GFI is negative at -5.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
1.99%
We repay more while GFI is negative at -234.99%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
4483.93%
Issuance growth of 4483.93% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.