PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Negative yoy D&A while GFI is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
46.81%
Deferred tax of 46.81% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-12.71%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GFI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GFI is 167.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while GFI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while GFI is negative at -109.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while GFI is 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with GFI at -19.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above GFI's 100.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while GFI is 91.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while GFI stands at 68.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GFI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
Issuance growth of 233.43% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while GFI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.