95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -74.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while KGC is 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-55.35%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -18.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
204.75%
Slight usage while KGC is negative at -11.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above KGC's 165.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-163.11%
Negative yoy while KGC is 319.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.42%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
62.15%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -59.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases well above KGC's 116.99%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with KGC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
5292.00%
Growth well above KGC's 148.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above KGC's 89.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -449.24%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -99.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.