95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -6.15%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.29%
Some D&A expansion while KGC is negative at -12.65%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-342.07%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -6.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
12.04%
Slight usage while KGC is negative at -284.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth while KGC is negative at -546.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while KGC is negative at -172.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 144.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. KGC's 600.80%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x KGC's 2.08%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
100.00%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -33.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -2388.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1645.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -281.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.