95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 99.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-32.92%
Negative yoy D&A while KGC is 15.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-85.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 113.48%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
25.51%
SBC growth well above KGC's 5.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-230.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while KGC is 125.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1258.62%
AR is negative yoy while KGC is 154.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-175.87%
Negative yoy AP while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
211.90%
Growth well above KGC's 271.75%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-575.00%
Negative yoy while KGC is 34.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.60%
Negative yoy CFO while KGC is 370.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -137.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-103909.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -597.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.