PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 756.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.46%
Less D&A growth vs. KGC's 18.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-25.34%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 273.86%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-31.81%
Negative yoy SBC while KGC is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-645.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while KGC is 393.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.36%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. KGC's 149.08%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -106.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
126.03%
Some yoy increase while KGC is negative at -1055.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.33%
Negative yoy CFO while KGC is 76.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-100.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -12.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-220.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 4524.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-143.26%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 30.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-69.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 96.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.