95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.04%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -81.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
17.29%
Some D&A expansion while KGC is negative at -11.54%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
91.74%
Some yoy growth while KGC is negative at -97.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
24.90%
SBC growth well above KGC's 15.15%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -94.85%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-114.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with KGC at -110.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -88.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
111.65%
Well above KGC's 82.65%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
11.63%
Some CFO growth while KGC is negative at -58.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-54981.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while KGC is 24.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-21.82%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 4483.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-138.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -15.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
33.32%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -5.56%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.