95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with KGC at -138.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with KGC at -7.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
148.87%
Well above KGC's 62.01% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
146.24%
SBC growth well above KGC's 9.09%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
156.82%
Well above KGC's 57.51% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.26%
AR growth well above KGC's 73.44%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
AP growth well above KGC's 31.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
202.40%
Growth well above KGC's 28.36%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
166.77%
Well above KGC's 194.20%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with KGC at -30.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
97.21%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -15.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 10.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
Liquidation growth of 138.24% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
84.20%
We have some outflow growth while KGC is negative at -6700.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
89.72%
We have mild expansions while KGC is negative at -14.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-13.29%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 98.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.