95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 2840.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with KGC at -9.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-2.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while KGC stands at 50.12%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.42%
SBC growth well above KGC's 25.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -49.48%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
AR is negative yoy while KGC is 312.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
117.96%
Some inventory rise while KGC is negative at -31.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-231.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with KGC at -162.13%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while KGC is negative at -161.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while KGC is negative at -74.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while KGC is negative at -0.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above KGC's 60.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
Growth well above KGC's 70.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
76.94%
We have mild expansions while KGC is negative at -246.30%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 44.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Issuance growth of 164.26% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.