PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 184.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with KGC at -12.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. KGC's 115.10%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-12.71%
Both cut yoy SBC, with KGC at -68.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-138.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with KGC at -1426.32%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while KGC is 168.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with KGC at -10.20%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-369.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with KGC at -108.41%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 100.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while KGC is negative at -108.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with KGC at -45.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while KGC is 19.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above KGC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while KGC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with KGC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 11000.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 31.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while KGC is 40.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
Issuance growth of 233.43% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to KGC's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.