PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while KGC is negative at -38.29%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
D&A growth well above KGC's 11.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
SBC growth while KGC is negative at -17.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
680.22%
Well above KGC's 166.13% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth well above KGC's 115.24%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while KGC is 103.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while KGC is 280.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Growth well above KGC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Both negative yoy, with KGC at -492.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.66%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -1.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with KGC at -78.56%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.62%
Purchases growth of 12.62% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
35189753.73%
Liquidation growth of 35189753.73% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-165.36%
We reduce yoy other investing while KGC is 114.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while KGC stands at 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
Debt repayment well below KGC's 64.27%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.