95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.10%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 97.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while KGC is 9.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
59100.18%
Some yoy growth while KGC is negative at -346.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
387.20%
SBC growth well above KGC's 300.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-270.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while KGC is 453.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.88%
AR is negative yoy while KGC is 301.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.69%
Lower AP growth vs. KGC's 832.69%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-385.98%
Negative yoy usage while KGC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.48%
Both negative yoy, with KGC at -112.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of KGC's 87.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
90.09%
Some CapEx rise while KGC is negative at -20.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.54%
We have some outflow growth while KGC is negative at -198.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
128.50%
We have mild expansions while KGC is negative at -27.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.68%
We repay more while KGC is negative at -5781.14%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
118.88%
Issuance growth of 118.88% while KGC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.