PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.05%
Net income growth at 75-90% of NEM's 101.56%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
104.09%
D&A growth well above NEM's 13.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. NEM's 233.33%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-24.94%
Both cut yoy SBC, with NEM at -12.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-260.68%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 419.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -27.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.55%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of NEM's 108.09%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-16656.97%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 30.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-16197.05%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 68.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.