95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -1.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
25.94%
Some D&A expansion while NEM is negative at -2.34%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
189.32%
Well above NEM's 84.85% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
44.54%
SBC growth well above NEM's 31.58%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
78.15%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -2771.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.73%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -98.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
96.72%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -210.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
12.50%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -8925.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -23.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
32.30%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -58.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
85.96%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -53.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 816.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-212.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -300.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-165.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -584.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.