95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.68%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 175.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -11.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
668.15%
Well above NEM's 90.27% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.35%
SBC growth of 6.35% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-467.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -1212.50%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.63%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 71.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.01%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. NEM's 456.41%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-0.89%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -95.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
0.08%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -33.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 30.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 39.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.86%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 17.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.