PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-76.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -225.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
50.21%
D&A growth well above NEM's 3.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
77.37%
Well above NEM's 28.05% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
159.27%
SBC growth well above NEM's 5.56%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
552.58%
Slight usage while NEM is negative at -259.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
12.24%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -169.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.03%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -190.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
50.75%
Growth well above NEM's 6.67%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
50.41%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 1747.62%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
34.00%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -66.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-160715.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -37.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.03%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. NEM's 82.93%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-18875.02%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 65.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
69.12%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of NEM's 96.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-422.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.