PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -150.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
Less D&A growth vs. NEM's 7.17%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
127.08%
Some yoy growth while NEM is negative at -179.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-72.04%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
266.55%
Well above NEM's 1.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth while NEM is negative at -95.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while NEM is 240.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -131.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
101.73%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 5288.89%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -6.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -153.85%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while NEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NEM at -93.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
108.52%
Growth well above NEM's 142.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-21.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -30.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.56%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of NEM's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.