PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 110.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.87%
Less D&A growth vs. NEM's 12.37%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
2028.04%
Well above NEM's 408.64% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
468.64%
SBC growth of 468.64% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
264.57%
Well above NEM's 51.59% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-119.34%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 30.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -88.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1196.43%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -16.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-185.37%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -59.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
0.04%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of NEM's 74.12%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
99.89%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 1.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above NEM's 97.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while NEM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-348.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -112.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.78%
Investing outflow well above NEM's 20.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-316.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.