PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.06%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -75.09%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.46%
Less D&A growth vs. NEM's 11.86%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-25.34%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-31.81%
Both cut yoy SBC, with NEM at -4.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-645.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 166.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.36%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. NEM's 120.12%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -26.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
126.03%
Well above NEM's 99.91%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7.33%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 52.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-100.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -0.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 166.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-220.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -28.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-143.26%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 6.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-69.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -5754.55%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.