PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 159.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -14.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-2.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NEM stands at 58.59%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.42%
SBC growth well above NEM's 5.88%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -1356.76%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -950.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
117.96%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -153.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-231.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -319.05%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -485.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -87.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while NEM is negative at -46.57%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above NEM's 0.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while NEM stands at 90.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NEM at -89.66%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
181.48%
We have some outflow growth while NEM is negative at -103.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
76.94%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -47.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 87.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Issuance growth of 164.26% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.