PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NEM at -11.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.34%
D&A growth well above NEM's 2.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-70.04%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-268.04%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
146.27%
Well above NEM's 92.04% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
186.50%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. NEM's 414.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while NEM is 93.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
Lower AP growth vs. NEM's 319.57%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 83.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Both negative yoy, with NEM at -86.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 50.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while NEM is negative at -18.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Purchases growth of 86.92% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -566.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.51%
Investing outflow well above NEM's 0.77%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 86.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-69.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.