PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.79%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -43.75%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -9.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
5873.13%
Well above NEM's 51.43% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
99.48%
SBC growth while NEM is negative at -22.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-35.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -737.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-84.06%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
123.20%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -3266.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
170.90%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -102.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
150.68%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -366.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-41373.38%
Negative yoy while NEM is 179.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-25.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NEM at -54.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-205.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -1.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
Some yoy expansion while NEM is negative at -16325.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5417.49%
Growth well above NEM's 75.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-161.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -137.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
0.50%
We repay more while NEM is negative at -6.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-96.55%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.