PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 124.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -19.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. NEM's 111.28%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -1148.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while NEM is 80.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with NEM at -1215.38%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-369.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -62.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-116.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -398.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -100.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NEM at -52.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 18.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while NEM is negative at -28.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-3857.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -90.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 153.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 2657.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 52.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while NEM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while NEM is negative at -2100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.