PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while NEM is negative at -57.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
D&A growth well above NEM's 5.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while NEM is negative at -60.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Well above NEM's 70.44% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. NEM's 704.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-70.23%
Negative yoy inventory while NEM is 47.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
113.08%
A yoy AP increase while NEM is negative at -642.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while NEM is 64.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. NEM's 766.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 37.84%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -17.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases well above NEM's 96.76%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -77.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.55%
We reduce yoy invests while NEM stands at 53.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
12.38%
Debt repayment growth of 12.38% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.