PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 5.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -1.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16.14%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-3.30%
Both cut yoy SBC, with NEM at -30.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-129.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NEM is 218.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-266.58%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -24.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
172.76%
Inventory growth well above NEM's 97.78%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
440.48%
AP growth well above NEM's 192.23%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
110.07%
Some yoy usage while NEM is negative at -23.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-44.47%
Negative yoy while NEM is 141.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-15.45%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 51.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -471.43%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while NEM stands at 82.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NEM at -10.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
157.57%
We have some outflow growth while NEM is negative at -97.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-133.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -60.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
4.52%
Debt repayment growth of 4.52% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while NEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.