PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.65%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 105.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.99%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with NEM at -59.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
97.55%
Well above NEM's 152.48% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.37%
Both cut yoy SBC, with NEM at -145.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -289.47%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1201.96%
AR growth well above NEM's 84.18%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while NEM is negative at -353.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-284.77%
Both negative yoy AP, with NEM at -71.70%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-84.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NEM at -188.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
8917.28%
Well above NEM's 8.62%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-11.81%
Negative yoy CFO while NEM is 25.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.80%
Lower CapEx growth vs. NEM's 7.61%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while NEM is negative at -96.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
82.91%
Some yoy expansion while NEM is negative at -58.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while NEM is 106.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-30.43%
We reduce yoy other investing while NEM is 1600.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
2.50%
We have mild expansions while NEM is negative at -255.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -84.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
103.42%
Stock issuance far above NEM's 100.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -900.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.