95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.07%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 9.10%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while NEM is 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.91%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. NEM's 73.60%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-18.22%
Negative yoy SBC while NEM is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
13.34%
Less working capital growth vs. NEM's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-419.97%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NEM at -5.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.58%
Growth well above NEM's 200.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
90.69%
Some yoy increase while NEM is negative at -48.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.01%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of NEM's 17.38%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-263.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while NEM is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while NEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
366.67%
We have some outflow growth while NEM is negative at -132.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-263.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with NEM at -3.79%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.