95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 52.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 47.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PAAS stands at 102.32%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -58.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
204.75%
Well above PAAS's 97.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above PAAS's 167.60%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-163.11%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 111.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.42%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 695.98%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
62.15%
Some CapEx rise while PAAS is negative at -5.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases well above PAAS's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while PAAS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
5292.00%
We have some outflow growth while PAAS is negative at -85.84%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above PAAS's 75.87%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -99.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
95.53%
Similar buyback growth to PAAS's 99.30%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.