PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 158.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 44.86%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PAAS at -121.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-147.76%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PAAS is 106.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
134.82%
AR growth of 134.82% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Some yoy usage while PAAS is negative at -16.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-202.13%
Both negative yoy, with PAAS at -103.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.83%
Negative yoy CFO while PAAS is 48.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while PAAS is negative at -38.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
129.23%
Liquidation growth of 129.23% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
69.70%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PAAS's 221.58%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while PAAS is negative at -15.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PAAS is 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.