95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 423.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 11.01%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
79.42%
SBC growth while PAAS is negative at -37.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -55.83%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PAAS at -4966.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
117.96%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 160.50%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-231.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with PAAS at -243.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while PAAS is negative at -442.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while PAAS is negative at -1514.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while PAAS is negative at -41.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 12.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PAAS at -2.65%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
181.48%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PAAS's 621.56%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
76.94%
Investing outflow well above PAAS's 23.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -0.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
164.26%
Stock issuance far above PAAS's 5.63%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.