PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while PAAS is negative at -125.99%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
Some D&A expansion while PAAS is negative at -13.23%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-167.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
50.53%
SBC growth well above PAAS's 50.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
680.22%
Less working capital growth vs. PAAS's 1953.33%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
109.57%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. PAAS's 490.68%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while PAAS is 274.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while PAAS is 3076.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Growth well above PAAS's 561.25%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 153.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth similar to PAAS's 45.99%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-396.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -9.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-152781.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -85.06%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
12.62%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PAAS's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
35189753.73%
We have some liquidation growth while PAAS is negative at -50.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -62.50%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with PAAS at -136.45%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
15.38%
Debt repayment well below PAAS's 97.30%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
2091.46%
Issuance growth of 2091.46% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.