95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.10%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 28.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while PAAS is 9.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
59100.18%
Some yoy growth while PAAS is negative at -31.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
387.20%
SBC growth of 387.20% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-270.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PAAS is 43.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-189.88%
AR is negative yoy while PAAS is 108.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.69%
AP growth well above PAAS's 5.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-385.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PAAS at -722.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-49.48%
Negative yoy while PAAS is 86.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PAAS's 165.08%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
90.09%
CapEx growth well above PAAS's 12.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases well above PAAS's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.54%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PAAS's 498.14%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
128.50%
Investing outflow well above PAAS's 15.84%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.68%
Debt repayment well below PAAS's 89.18%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
118.88%
Issuance growth of 118.88% while PAAS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.